
I said last year that I was going to start a sister blog devoted to art. Rather than wait to make it fancy, I decided to just start posting something and worry about the details later.
The purpose of this blog is to enjoy and discuss art of every kind. So, what is art? That's the other twist to this particular blog. We will not only attempt to enjoy and appreciate art, we will discuss philosophical issues related to aesthetics, the branch of philosophy dealing with art. Why is that different? Most modern intellectuals seem to take the position that art is undefinable. That it is some mystery beyond human reason and comprehension. This view, stemming from the broader modern assault on objectivity, has resulted in a deluge of nonsense masquerading as art being foisted upon the public. I titled the blog, The Rational Artist, not only for symmetry with my main site, The Rational Capitalist, but to emphasize what would seem to be a contradiction in today's subjectivist intellectual milieu, namely, that however difficult, art can be defined, analyzed, understood, and enjoyed.
Another important aspect of this blog is that while I appreciate certain forms of art, and I am a part-time musician and oil painter, my tastes are my tastes and my knowledge base, particularly in certain forms of art, is limited to say the least. Therefore, while I will certainly drive the site, I regard this site to be more of a collaborative effort in which I encourage readers to send me ideas, commentary, analysis, etc. (at the above email address or in the comment forms), and I will gladly make it a part of the proceedings.
I chose the quote above (from a Dave Matthew's song...), "come in from the noise", because this is, in a sense, the function of art. In a very real way, art is an attempt to select out from the noise of our daily experience a concrete representation of some aspect of reality for our contemplation. Whether that representation is a sculpture, story, painting, music, physical movement, or some combination, the artist selects, in Ayn Rand's words, "those aspects of reality which represent man's fundamental view of himself and of existence." While we will discuss these topics in more detail later, for now I hope you regard this site as a way to come in from the noise of the world - a world that seems to be getting increasingly noisier.
The purpose of this blog is to enjoy and discuss art of every kind. So, what is art? That's the other twist to this particular blog. We will not only attempt to enjoy and appreciate art, we will discuss philosophical issues related to aesthetics, the branch of philosophy dealing with art. Why is that different? Most modern intellectuals seem to take the position that art is undefinable. That it is some mystery beyond human reason and comprehension. This view, stemming from the broader modern assault on objectivity, has resulted in a deluge of nonsense masquerading as art being foisted upon the public. I titled the blog, The Rational Artist, not only for symmetry with my main site, The Rational Capitalist, but to emphasize what would seem to be a contradiction in today's subjectivist intellectual milieu, namely, that however difficult, art can be defined, analyzed, understood, and enjoyed.
Another important aspect of this blog is that while I appreciate certain forms of art, and I am a part-time musician and oil painter, my tastes are my tastes and my knowledge base, particularly in certain forms of art, is limited to say the least. Therefore, while I will certainly drive the site, I regard this site to be more of a collaborative effort in which I encourage readers to send me ideas, commentary, analysis, etc. (at the above email address or in the comment forms), and I will gladly make it a part of the proceedings.
I chose the quote above (from a Dave Matthew's song...), "come in from the noise", because this is, in a sense, the function of art. In a very real way, art is an attempt to select out from the noise of our daily experience a concrete representation of some aspect of reality for our contemplation. Whether that representation is a sculpture, story, painting, music, physical movement, or some combination, the artist selects, in Ayn Rand's words, "those aspects of reality which represent man's fundamental view of himself and of existence." While we will discuss these topics in more detail later, for now I hope you regard this site as a way to come in from the noise of the world - a world that seems to be getting increasingly noisier.
For now, I will leave you with a recent article sent to me by a friend about one of my all time favorite painters, Thomas Eakins. I also wrote about Eakins's medical paintings in a broader context here. At the top is one of my favorite paintings of his, Portrait of Maud Cook, which I saw in person and wrote about here. Enjoy.
Congratulations on taking the plunge! I'll do what I can to spread the word.
ReplyDeleteThanks Beth!
ReplyDeleteGorgeous inaugural painting. I look forward to reading your blog!
ReplyDeleteGreat idea Doug.
ReplyDeleteI've been to the Speed Museum, many years ago (though I admit I don't remember much). I grew up in southern IN.
I hope you've been to the Met in NYC. There are some absolutely stunning artworks there, and not just paintings. Don't get me started :) Went to art school at Brooklyn College.
Great stuff. I look forward to lots of great art, and lots of great discussions about it.
ReplyDeletePeter Cresswell
"Art to Ignite Your Soul"
InspiratioNZ
http://www.inspirationz.com
Thanks all for the encouragement!
ReplyDeleteMtn, I have been to the Met and thoroughly enjoyed. Please feel free to send me stuff you like.
Peter, your wonderful art posts were one of the inspirations for me to get moving on this site so thanks. I anticipate linking over to your stuff frequently.
again, I hope readers will enjoy postings and also use this to share their favorites with others
I'm really excited about your new project, Doug! And thanks, Beth, for spreading the word. (I saw your post first in my reader.)
ReplyDeleteThanks Lynne, look forward to some posting some good poetry, send me ideas if you wish
ReplyDeletego Douch. After reading rand's romantic manifesto, I have had a surge in Art. Before that I thought of Art very poorly
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you sir. Pleased to be of inspiration. :-)
ReplyDeleteA stellar portrait. Thanks for alerting me to an outstanding piece I haven't seen before - always one of life's largest joys.
ReplyDeleteJeff,
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it! Eakins stuff is a treasure trove of this kind of work.
Doug
Great painting. Are you familiar with Joseph Stieler's work? Seems like it would be right up your alley. For example, his portrait of Katerina Botsaris...
ReplyDeletehttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KaterinaRosaBotzaris.jpg
Jason,
ReplyDeleteI briefly checked out Stieler, and he looks like a great portrait artist in the neoclassical style. I personally prefer the later Romantic painters that came along in the generation after Stieler. I think there is a more realistic, nuanced style to someone like Eakins compared to the the neoclassical painters like Stieler. For example, when I look at the hands in a Stieler, it looks much less convincing than Eakins or Gerome. I personally can see a huge difference in quality. curious what others think. thanks much!
Doug,
ReplyDeleteYou are right. The more I immerse myself with art, the more I like the subtlety, use of light and shadow, and great texture in painters like Capuletti, Vermeer, and Eakins, as opposed to the more plain, less textured, less nuanced painters like Stieler.
Stieler is more of a "quick, nice, pretty fix," while Capuletti and Eakins demand more focus to appreciate, but provide more contemplative enjoyment via their method of taking many particular, tangible, small human touches and piecing them into an almost rough-looking, almost grainy in how fine and precise the details are, whole.
That "graininess", or texture, is the precision that's lacking in Stieler.